Skip to content
Macro

Jobless claims: recent range

US initial jobless claims last printed at 189,000 for the week ended 2026-04-25, versus a recent average of 207,500 on 2026-04-25, according to the Labor Department's weekly report and FREDdol.gov fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org). Continuing claims were 1,785,000 and the insured unemployment rate was 1.2 for the week ended 2026-04-18fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org), so the fast read is still low and stable, not a labor-market break. For context, the unemployment rate was 4.3% in March 2026 and the fed funds upper bound was 3.75% on 2026-05-01fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org). The short-end yield was 3.88%, the long-end yield was 4.40%, and the curve spread was 0.52 on 2026-04-30fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org). In our scenario framework, a move above 207,500 with continuing claims above 1,785,000 would likely shift the rates read toward broader cooling; another print near 189,000 would leave the current low-stable claims regime intact.

US initial jobless claims were 189,000 in the latest weekly report for the week ended 2026-04-25, against a recent average of 207,500 on 2026-04-25, per the Labor Department and FREDdol.gov fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org). Continuing claims were 1,785,000 and the insured unemployment rate was 1.2 for the week ended 2026-04-18fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org), which keeps the message simple: layoffs are still low and re-employment is not obviously deteriorating. That is why claims are priced more as a confirmation check than a regime-shift trigger. The broader macro backdrop still fits that read: the unemployment rate was 4.3% in March 2026, the fed funds upper bound was 3.75% on 2026-05-01, the short-end yield was 3.88%, the long-end yield was 4.40%, and the curve spread was 0.52 on 2026-04-30fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org fred.stlouisfed.org). In our scenario framework, a print above 207,500 with continuing claims above 1,785,000 would likely shift the rates read toward broader labor cooling; another number near 189,000 would keep this in the low-stable bucket.